Topic We Cover: Top MBA colleges in India
1. The Factors
- College Perception
- Alumni Reviews
- Academics and Infrastructure
- Placements
2. Top private MBA colleges in India
"Top MBA Colleges in India" has become an area of great search over the internet on the Indian education space. While only the IIMs held sway until a few years back, the rise of top private MBA colleges has made management education ubiquitous amongst Indian students.
The reasons behind such a rise in demand are many. India is very well positioned in the state of global affairs to be amongst the cluster of countries which will spear economic growth. Being in such a position, the need for top-draw management professionals is obvious in the Indian industry.
NMIMS is one of India’s best B-schools
The Factors
MBA college rankings are not done on the basis of mere hunches. To establish a level playing field for all the top B-Schools in India, it is necessary to establish certain common factors upon which each college or university will be judged fairly. Since each factor will be given equal weightage, we will eventually obtain fair B-school rankings of India.
The factors chosen to rank the top MBA colleges in India are:
1. College Perception
Although top MBA colleges in India such as the IIMs have a well-established perception amongst management aspirants, private B-schools colleges have to work much harder to create a positive narrative around their institution.
While ranking the top private MBA colleges in India, analyzing the college perception is an essential part of the process
SIU is one of the Top Private MBA Colleges in the country
2. Alumni Reviews
Alumni reviews are very important as they give a completely unbiased account of a college or university’s education programme.
Private MBA colleges and universities do their best to portray a positive image around the college, but the real story is only known by the alumni of the college. The importance of alumni reviews cannot be overstated, as they are the only source which depicts a completely undistorted view of a college.
3. Academics and Infrastructure
Academic structure and infrastructural facilities are the cogs which run the ever present machine for every top business school in India. These two aspects of an MBA college go a long way in asserting the propensity of a college to provide a solid management degree.
The success achieved by top management institutions in the country such as XLRI, ISB and the IIMs is down to the presence of a strong academic structure and sound infrastructural facilities for students
4. Placements
Placements are one of the key reasons why most graduates in the country entertain the thought of pursuing a MBA degree. The top MBA colleges in India are able to get much better placements for their students due to a number of reasons.
To think of placements as an independent factor is a misguided notion. In essence, placements can be considered a summation of all the aforementioned factors and other aspects such as industry outreach and alumni network.
Get Updated Review ( Voice Based Alumni Feeback)
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Lovely Professional University - [LPU] – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Amity University – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - DIT University Dehradoon – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Graphic Era University – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Ansal University – Click Here
Top private MBA colleges in India are discussed below.
|
Ranking |
College/University |
Perception (out of ten) |
Alumni reviews (out of ten) |
Academics (out of 10) |
Placements (out of 10) |
|
1 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
|
|
The best private B-school in the country |
Student feedback is overwhelmingly positive |
A well balanced curriculum which has been doctored multiple times to surgically enhance industry integration |
Placements are excellent across the board |
||
|
2 |
9.9 |
9.9 |
9.8 |
9.9 |
|
|
One of the best MBA colleges in the India
|
Feedback is overwhelmingly positive |
Offers a course well corroborated with industry demands. Curriculum is flexible as course offered is PGDM |
Some of the best placement packages for management students are offered at MDI |
||
|
3
|
9.9 |
9.9 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
|
|
Regarded as one of the best private B-schools in the country |
Feedback is largely positive |
Integration of industrial inputs with management essentials |
Recruitment has remained top-draw since its inception a few decades back |
||
|
4
|
Indian School of Business, Hyderabad
|
9.8 |
9.9
|
9.8 |
9.8 |
|
Counted amongst the best MBA colleges in the country |
Feedback is overwhelmingly favorable |
Offers a one of a kind academic structure catered to students looking for industry oriented |
Placement cell is very active as companies from all around the world visit the campus |
||
|
5 |
SP Jain Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai |
9.8 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
|
Amongst the best MBA colleges in India |
Feedback is par excellence |
Some of the best faculties in India teaching some of the brightest talents in india makes academic programme one of the best in the country |
Placements are excellent and on par with the best IIMs |
||
|
6
|
9.8 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
9.7 |
|
|
Niche based B-school specializing in rural management. One of the best in the country |
Reviews are largely positive |
Focus is essentially on the working of the mechanics of rural areas and how modern management can be ingratiated into such areas |
Placements are specific to the branch of study |
||
|
7
|
Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studies, Mumbai |
9.7 |
9.8 |
9.8 |
9.7 |
|
Amongst the top MBA colleges in the country |
Majoritarian view over college is positive |
Key emphasis on ingratiating students with corporate life and making them aware of the necessary standards |
Placements are excellent across all branches |
||
|
8 |
Symbiosis Centre for Management and Human Resource Development, Pune |
9.7 |
9.7 |
9.8 |
9.7 |
|
Another renowned name in management education in India. Part of Symbiosis University campus |
Largely popular amongst alumni and current students |
Academically well structured to deal and modify curriculum based upon market dynamics |
Placement record has been very good over the years |
||
|
9 |
Great Lakes Institutes of Management, Chennai |
9.2 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
|
Amongst the top B-schools in South India |
College reviews are very positive |
Encourages new techniques of learning and ingratiates industry advice into its fold |
Placements are excellent with many companies visiting campus across the board |
||
|
10 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
|
|
Derives its popularity from the main campus in Hyderabad. |
Feedback is very favorable |
Sets the tone in academics with a key focus on research output and practical learning |
Placements are very good and diverse owing to the B-school’s impeccable brand name |
||
|
11 |
9.1 |
9.1 |
9.0 |
9.1 |
|
|
Renowned for its all-round management programme. Amongst the best MBA colleges in Delhi |
Alumni reviews highlight the college’s qualities in academics and infrastructure |
Seamless integration channels with leading industrial companies |
Placement record highlights the connections of the institution with top-rated companies |
||
|
12 |
Ta Pai Management Institute, Manipal |
9.0 |
9.1 |
9.0 |
9.1 |
|
Considered the best B-school in India which accepts MAT scores |
Feedback is largely positive |
Balanced approach with focus equated between practical learning and theoretical concepts. |
Placements are very good and diverse owing to the B-school’s impeccable brand name |
||
|
13 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.1 |
|
|
Known as one of the best colleges for MBA in North India
|
Feedback is chiefly favorable |
Academic programme is strong with highly qualified teachers and critical industry integration |
Recruitments are extremely consistent with an in-house well-connected placement cell |
||
|
14 |
Institute for Financial Management and Research, Sri City |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
|
Very old and renowned in South India |
Reviews from ex-students highlight are highly praiseworthy of the college |
Academic structure is well balanced industry-oriented training and traditional management techniques |
Placement reports of the college has been very consistent over the years |
||
|
15 |
8.9 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
|
|
Considered amongst the nest B-schools in Tamil Nadu and India in general |
Feedback is fundamentally favorable |
Rigorous academic structure is eased by relaxed approach of faculties |
Placements are extremely consistent in keeping with the college name |
||
|
16 |
FORE School of Management, Delhi |
8.9 |
9.0 |
9.0 |
8.9 |
|
One of the oldest and most respected B-schools in Delhi |
Feedback is mainly favorable |
Due to no affiliation with any university, FORE freely changes its curriculum to suit the needs of the industry |
Placement programme is excellent , but not on par with aforementioned institutions |
||
|
17 |
Institute of Finance and International Management, Bangalore |
8.9 |
8.9 |
9.0 |
8.9 |
|
A well-respected brand for MBA in South India, especially Bangalore |
Feedback is positive citing the college’s industry ingrained approach |
Has close ties to may recruiters and constantly changer curriculum according to changing trends |
Placements are very good due to strong ties with recruiters |
||
|
18 |
Indian Institute of Health Management Research, Jaipur |
8.9 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
|
Known primarily for MBA courses for hospital management |
Considered the best MBA college in India for hospital management by alumni |
In tune with new developments in medical management |
Placements are excellent within its own niche of healthcare management |
||
|
19 |
Prince L.N Welingkar Institute of Management and Research, Mumbai |
8.9 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
8.8 |
|
One of the oldest and most respected names for management studies in Mumbai |
Feedback is very favorable |
Low intake and intensive training under a industry-oriented curriculum ensures academic quality. |
Placements have been consistently good for the past few years |
||
|
20 |
Jindal Global Business School, Sonepat |
8.9 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
8.8 |
|
Known to better than most MBA colleges in India |
Alumni perception is satisfactory |
Reasonable balance between new management techniques and old MBA studies |
Placements aren’t path-breaking but better than other MBA colleges |
||
|
21 |
Bharathidasan Institute of Management, Tiruchirapalli |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
8.8 |
|
Known across India for its management courses |
Feedback from alumni speaks volumes of praise for the B-school |
Well attenuated with new trends of management studies and market dynamics |
Placements are generally decent, but the quality of recruitment isn’t as illustrious as other top MBA colleges |
||
|
22 |
Birla Institute of Management Technology, Greater Noida |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
|
Well known and respected in North India
|
Feedback is fundamentally favorable |
Reasonably good, but not as holistic as some of the top MBA colleges |
Placement record shows consistency over the past few years |
||
|
23 |
Goa Institute of Management, Goa |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
|
Relatively lesser known than most top B-schools, but retains a very positive perception amongst those who do |
Ex-students are highly praiseworthy of the college |
Is closely knit with the changing structures of the modern market |
Placement programme is excellent
|
||
|
24
|
Nirma University, Ahmedabad |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.8 |
|
Well known and respected across the country |
Feedback is largely positive |
Well drafted curriculum taking into account modern management methods |
Placements have been consistently since the university’s inception |
||
|
25 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
|
|
Well known in UP. Better than most MBA colleges in UP
|
Alumni perception is chiefly upbeat |
Academically balanced in their approach |
Placements are reasonably good considering the record of some other MBA colleges in the state |
||
|
26 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
|
|
Known mostly in South India |
Alumni perception of the college is generally positive |
Healthy level of industry exposure is a strong point in academic programme |
Placements are decent, but not as lucrative as the like of ISB or XLRI |
||
|
27 |
Symbiosis Institute of Operations Management, Nasik |
8.7 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
|
Under the control of Symbiosis University in Pune |
Perception amongst ex-students is generally positive |
Healthy integration with industry, which is necessary for operations management |
Placements are very good owing to the Symbiosis name synonymous across India |
||
|
28 |
Amity Business School, Noida
|
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
|
Perception is decent in Delhi-NCR region |
Alumni perception is relatively positive. A key back-draw is considered to be its high intake |
Academic dispersion is difficult to maintain due to high intake |
Placements are relatively better than some, but largely average. |
||
|
29 |
Xavier Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship, Bangalore |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
8.6 |
|
‘Xavier’ brand name helps build good perception besides string showings in placements |
Feedback is dominated by positive reviews |
Not as coherent as XLRI but a good level of management education |
Placements are again not as path breaking as XLRI |
||
|
30 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
|
|
Known and respected in South India for MBA and BBA |
Alumni perception is excellent |
Academically more focuses on theoretical side of management |
Placements are good but quality of placement isn’t ideal |
||
|
31 |
Jaipuria Institute of Management, Noida |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
|
Known primarily in Delhi-NCR region |
Alumni reception is relatively favorable with a few highlighting some drawbacks such as course structure and industry integration |
Focus is largely on traditional management studies rather than a more industry-oriented approach |
Lacking industry integration doesn’t help. Placements are average considering the record of colleges mentioned before |
||
|
32 |
ITM Business School, Navi Mumbai |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
|
Household name in management studies in most parts of India |
Feedback is generally positive. Some drawbacks cited is lack of proper infrastructure and accommodation facilities |
Not as good as other top B-schools, but decent in its own right |
Placements, like academics aren’t as top-draw as IIMs or SPJIMR, but relatively decent |
||
|
33 |
Jagan Institute of Management Studies, Delhi |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
Known mostly in Delhi and neighboring states
|
Alumni feedback suggests JIMS is a relatively above average MBA college |
Academically consistent with affiliation to IPU |
Placements are decent, but not as good as IMT and MDI. |
||
|
34
|
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
|
|
Known very well amongst MBA aspirants |
Alumni perception is relatively favorable |
Academics are well balanced between theoretical and practical concepts |
Placements have been consistently decent |
||
|
35 |
Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Institute of Management and Research, Delhi |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.4 |
|
Known primarily because of BV brand name |
Alumni perception is mixed suggesting some good and poor traits |
Academic standards are decent with reasonably good faculties |
Placements are average with most standard recruiters visiting campus
|
||
|
36 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
8.4 |
|
|
In Symbiosis main campus in Pune |
Alumni perception is largely positive |
Academic focus well construed as international business is a very dynamic field |
Placements are decent owing to the Symbiosis tag |
||
|
37 |
Symbiosis Institute of Telecom Management, Pune |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
8.4 |
|
In Symbiosis main campus in Pune. Branch of MBA not as famous as IB, HR, OM or Finance |
Alumni perception is largely positive |
Focuses on the working of telecom structure and the necessary managerial requirements of the sector |
Placement programme focuses on recruitments from telecom and related sectors |
||
|
38 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
|
|
In Symbiosis main campus in Pune |
Alumni perception is largely positive |
Curriculum is designed to ingratiate new management techniques with traditional methods of teaching |
Placements are very good owing to the Symbiosis name |
||
|
39 |
Symbiosis Centre for Information Technology, Pune |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
|
In Symbiosis main campus in Pune. Relatively less popular branch |
Alumni perception is largely positive |
Academic structure is as strong as any other field of study at Symbiosis |
Placements aren’t as robust as field isn’t as popular in the industry |
||
|
40 |
Symbiosis Institute of Media and Communication, Pune |
8.4 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
In Symbiosis main campus in Pune. Relatively less popular branch |
Alumni perception is largely positive |
Curriculum is well structured focusing on the inner workings of media houses |
Placements are entirely niche based |
||
|
41 |
8.4 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
In Symbiosis main campus in Pune. Relatively less popular branch |
Alumni perception is largely positive |
Well stacked curriculum for proper business management studies |
Placement record of great owing to the university’s popularity |
||
|
42 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
|
Recently established by HCL founder Shiv Nadar, so naturally has a solid reputation |
Alumni reviews praise the college infrastructure and facilities |
Curriculum is designed to ingratiate industrial needs
|
Placements haven’t taken off as university is still relatively new
|
||
|
43 |
PSG Institute of Management, Coimbatore |
8.3 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
Not as popular for MBA than it is for B.Tech |
Alumni reviews suggest MBA programme offered is excellent |
Academic focus adopts same attitude as it did with B.Tech |
Placements are decent, but most recruiters come from the IT sector |
||
|
44 |
Fortune Institute of International Business, Delhi |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
Known mostly in Delhi-NCR region |
Response is usually positive citing the college’s infrastructure and affordability |
Reasonably good curriculum with a number of quality faculties |
Industry exposure is relatively average |
||
|
45 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.2 |
|
|
Is popular along with overall KIIT brand in East India and other parts of the country |
Reviews are largely positive |
Focus is mostly on traditional techniques of management, but reasonably balanced with several other industry-related programmes |
Placements are decent, but quality vs quantity factor comes into the picture |
||
|
46 |
Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
More known for its B.E programme |
Alumni perception is mixed |
Academic approach is balanced with reasonable weight given to industry exposure |
Placements are not as renowned for MBA students as they are for B.E students |
||
|
47 |
Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
Popularity is derived from the Xavier tag |
Alumni review are reasonably positive
|
Academic programme is well designed on the basis of the curriculum at XLRI |
Placements are good, but not as good as XLRI
|
||
|
48
|
Shri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara Institute for Management Development, Mysore |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
|
Largely known in South India |
Alumni reviews are relatively positive. Some reviews suggested college had average faculties and placements |
Focus largely remains on theoretical aspects of management |
Lacks a strong alumni network for high quality placements, but overall record is decent |
||
|
49 |
Doon Business School, Dehradun |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
|
Perception is very positive amongst general public and MBA aspirants |
Reviews from ex-students present positive outlook towards the B-school |
Lack of industry exposure is a drawback in overall academic programme |
Placements are very good with most standard hirers visiting the campus |
||
|
50 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
|
|
Relatively unknown in other parts, but well established name in North India |
Reviews suggest college is decent but focus is too concentrated on academics |
Affiliated to IPU, which implies it follows a standard curriculum |
Placements are above average for a relatively unknown college in Delhi |
||
|
51 |
Entrepreneurship and Management Processes International, Delhi |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
|
Many don’t prefer the college believing their curriculum affects job prospects
|
Alumni perception is exceptional, highlighting college’s unique approach to management studies |
Radically different from quotidian MBA colleges with string focus in developing practical skills and industrial knowledge |
Placements are a bit underwhelming, but the college is known to encourage entrepreneurial spirit |
||
|
52 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
|
Reputation banked upon popularity of parent university in Pune
|
Alumni reviews are very positive |
Focus is balanced between industry-oriented concepts and old school learning |
Placements are decent due to popularity of Symbiosis tag |
||
|
53 |
Regional College of Management, Bhubaneswar |
8.1 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
One of the oldest MBA colleges in Orissa. Relatively unknown outside the state |
General alumni perception is positive |
Reasonably decent infrastructure, but quality of teaching is suspect |
Placements are below average due to lack of industrial outreach |
||
|
54 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
|
More popular for its B.Tech course. MBA course less popular |
General perception is mixed. Some suggest the presence of needless strictness regarding academics |
Academics are considered average with more focus on theoretical concepts |
Placements are good compared to other colleges in the state |
||
|
55 |
Adani Institute of Infrastructure Management, Ahmedabad |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
7.9 |
|
College isn’t known outside Gujarat |
Alumni perception is largely negative |
Good faculties help in improving overall academic structure |
Not on par with other B-schools |
||
|
56 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
|
Primarily known across India for its B.Tech programme. MBA is relatively unknown |
Feedback for MBA programme is relatively positive |
Intake is low, which helps the quality of teaching, but lack of prominent faculties a big problem |
Placements for MBA students aren’t as robust as B.Tech graduates |
||
|
57 |
International Management Institute, Bhubaneswar |
8.0 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
Known mostly because of the famous Delhi campus |
Alumni reviews are mixed about IMI-B |
Intake is low, but integration with industry-based courses found lacking |
Placements are average when compared to other top B-schools |
||
|
58
|
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
|
Known primarily in Kerala
|
Alumni reviews are relatively positive |
Academic programme built upon key focus on curriculum based learning only |
Placements are above average considering the situation of other B-schools |
||
|
59 |
Manipal University, Manipal |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
|
Reputation built purely on Manipal brand name |
Alumni perception is divided between positive and negative reviews |
Academic standards aren’t ideal for core management education |
Placements are about average relative to most B-schools |
||
|
60 |
7.9 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
|
|
Reputation rests upon popularity of XLRI
|
Alumni reviews are generally decent |
Academics focus is well knitted between theoretical and practical demands |
Placements are good, but not as high profile as XLRI |
||
|
61 |
Sri Sathya Sai Institute of Higher Learning, Prasanthi Nilayam |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
|
Well known and respected college in Andhra Pradesh |
Alumni reviews are relatively positive. Some sight lack of proper infrastructure as key drawback |
Curriculum is relatively balanced between pure theoretical concepts and industry-oriented methods |
Placements are average when compared to other B-schools in India |
||
|
62 |
Institute of Management and Information Science, Bhubaneswar |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
|
Unknown outside nearby regions in Jharkhand and other parts of Central and Eastern India |
Feedback implies the college is largely average |
Curriculum isn’t up to the standard of modern management needs |
Placements at IMIS are not up to the mark |
||
|
63 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
|
|
Perception is ambivalent as college is more famous for its B.Tech programme
|
Alumni reviews are balanced between positive and negative opinions |
Academics aren’t as well-oiled as other top MBA institutions |
Placements are just about average with most recruitments for sales positions |
||
|
64 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
|
|
Known primarily for its popular B.Tech course. MBA course was offered only recently |
Response is mixed. Reviews suggest infrastructure is good, but largely focused on engineering students |
Academic programme is largely focused on old school style of management |
Placements are average even with the VIT tag |
||
|
65 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
|
|
Known mostly by the Jaipuria brand name |
Feedback is divided between good and bad reviews |
Curriculum similar to other JIM campuses. |
Placements are reliant on companies visiting main campus in Lucknow |
||
|
66 |
SRM University, Chennai |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
|
More known for its B.Tech programme |
Alumni perception is mixed |
Academic approach is stringent upon conventional management studies |
Placements are middling relative to other B-school placement reports |
||
|
67 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
|
|
Unknown outside the state |
Perception is mixed between positive and negative reviews |
Due to affiliation with state university, curriculum is too narrow for optimum management studies |
Placements at Rungta are average |
||
|
68 |
GL Bajaj Institute of Management and Technology, Greater Noida |
7.6 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
|
Known only in Delhi-NCR region. Its B.Tech programme is more |
Reviews are usually mixed, with most citing the college’s single-minded approach to academics too strenuous. |
Academics are more intertwined with the theoretical side of management studies |
Placements are average compared to other top MBA colleges |
||
|
69 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
|
|
Relatively unknown Delhi-NCR region. Considered decent amongst MAT score accepting colleges
|
Reviews are
relatively positive |
Approach to
management studies is too obtuse
|
Placements aren’t a guarantee like other top MBA colleges, but good students do get good jobs |
||
|
70 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
|
|
Known well due to the popularity of Delhi campus |
Alumni perception is relatively positive |
Academics aren’t as well structured as Delhi campus since college was only recently established |
Placements are good, but not up to the scale as of now |
||
|
71
|
Bharati Vidyapeeth’s Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship Development, Pune |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.5 |
|
Well known in Maharashtra. Not as famous elsewhere |
Alumni perception is positive |
Quality of academics is maintained as intake is always limited to a certain number |
Placements are above average relative to other colleges |
||
|
72 |
KJ Somaiya Institute of Management Studies and Research, Mumbai |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
Perception is positive in Mumbai and other parts of Western India |
Reviews are relatively positive |
Affiliation to central university hampers college from being sensitive to market dynamics |
Placements have been consistently decent over the years |
||
|
73 |
Acharya Institute of Management and Sciences, Bangalore |
7.6 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
Perception is generally average in Karnataka |
Reviews suggest lack of infrastructural capabilities |
Lack of industry exposure hurts the academic structure |
Placements are just average |
||
|
74 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
|
College perception is positive, but only in Gujarat. Unknown elsewhere |
Alumni perception is relatively positive |
Academic structure is very theoretical in nature |
Placements are average when compared to average recruitment statistics of other B-schools |
||
|
75 |
Dr CV Raman University, Bhubaneswar |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
|
Well known for B.Tech programme. MBA not as popular |
MBA alumni perception is relatively negative |
Academic focus is restricted to theoretical studies |
Placements are below average |
||
|
76 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
|
|
College perception is largely average |
Alumni perception is relatively negative
|
Academic structure is based upon conventional methods of management studies |
Placements are underwhelming compared to other MBA colleges in Bangalore |
||
|
77 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
|
|
General perception in Haryana is positive |
Alumni reviews are mostly divided, with students applauding college infrastructure but criticizing placements |
Infrastructural facilities are sound, but academically too stringent on old school management teaching |
Placements are average |
||
|
78 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
|
|
Not famous particularly for its MBA course |
Perception is relatively average |
Academics are reasonably average considering the college is more famous for engineering |
Placement programme is more focused on getting engineering students placed |
||
|
79 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
|
|
Borrows its popularity from its much more popular counterpart, IMT Ghaziabad |
Perception is positive, but not as unanimous as its Northern counterpart |
Academic programme is ingratiated reasonably well with industrial dynamics |
Recruitments are reliant primarily on the ‘IMT’ tag |
||
|
80 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
|
|
Unknown outside the state |
Alumni reviews are comparatively negative |
Academics are skewed towards rote learning of management concepts |
Placement cell isn’t adequate when compared to dexterity of other MBA colleges |
||
|
81 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
|
|
College perception is average in West Bengal region. Unknown elsewhere |
Alumni perception is mixed |
Affiliation to central university greatly restricts curriculum diversity |
Placements aren’t on the level of a given average B-school |
||
|
82 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
|
|
Unknown outside Orissa |
Alumni perception is relatively negative |
Affiliation to central university greatly restricts curriculum veracity |
Placements are below average |
||
|
83 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
|
|
College perception is largely premised on reputation of parent university, JIIT, which is more famous for engineering
|
Alumni perception is positive |
Industry dynamics are not ingratiated to the ideal degree |
Placements are decent as college is bolstered by its brand name |
||
|
84
|
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
|
|
Perception was hurt by the controversy which erupted 2016 over the administrative control of the college |
Alumni review have been disparaging over the administrative muddle at the college |
Academics programme is a well-oiled machine focused on old-school management |
Placements have been hurt by lack of stability in administration |
||
|
85 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
|
|
Perception is reasonably good in Pune and other parts of the state |
Alumni reviews are relatively negative. Some cite lack of infrastructure and industry integration as key drawback |
Academics are not ingratiated with real world industry kinematics |
Students are placed easily as there isn’t as much competition, but quality of placement isn’t as attractive |
||
|
86 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
|
|
College is known only in Pune region |
Feedback is relatively positive, barring some pointing out infrastructural deficits |
Academic programme is well balanced between theoretical and practical aspects of management |
Placements are found lacking compared to recruitments of other B-schools |
||
|
87 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
|
|
Unknown in most parts of India. Perception in Orissa isn’t top class either |
Alumni perception is moderately negative |
Curriculum is tied down due to stringent affiliation with central university |
Placements are sub-standard |
||
|
88 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
|
|
Popular only because of Xavier name |
Alumni perception is relatively positive |
Entirely niche based curriculum. |
Placements are mostly niche based, which somewhat hampers overall placements |
||
|
89 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
|
|
Niche based college, well received amongst aspirants looking for a career in the insurance sector |
Reviews are very generally very positive |
Academic focus is mainly on the insurance industry |
Placements are mostly niche based |
||
|
90 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
|
|
Lack of MBA course harms reputation to some extent |
Review are relatively positive |
Academic goal is well aligned with industry and market dynamics |
Placements are good in terms of quantity, but not quality. Average package is low |
||
|
91 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
|
|
Generally known in Pune region only. |
Alumni reviews are relatively positive. Some sight the dearth in proper infrastructure as a hassle |
Academic programme is well planned and quality of MBA studies are maintained |
Placements are average when compared to other B-schools in the state |
||
|
92
|
7.0 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.0 |
|
|
Known primarily for engineering within the nearby regions only |
Alumni find the colleges lacking in a number of areas
|
Academically found lacking for management studies |
Placements are below average, as most companies come for B.Tech graduates |
||
|
93 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
|
|
Relatively new compared to other MBA colleges so perception isn’t overwhelmingly positive |
Alumni reviews are relatively positive |
Healthy level of industry exposure |
Since college is new, alumni network isn’t up to scale which hampers placements |
||
|
94 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
|
|
College perception is average |
Alumni reviews are middling, most rating the college as a average B-school |
Academic plan is focused on rigorous training in traditional management studies |
Since intake is less, placements are reasonably decent but quality of placement isn’t an ideal ROI |
||
|
95 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
|
|
College perception isn’t up to the mark
|
Alumni review are largely average |
Academic curriculum is stringent due to affiliation with central university |
Placements aren’t up to the mark. College doesn’t have a good ROI |
||
|
96 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
Known mostly by the NMIMS brand name |
Feedback is relatively mixed |
Curriculum is well balanced |
Placements programme is reliant on performance of Mumbai campus |
||
|
97 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
Known only in Karnataka region. |
Overall ratio of good and bad review cancel each other out |
Academics is more focused on traditional style of MBA studies |
Placements are about average considering performance of other B-schools |
||
|
98 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
Known primarily for B.Tech course |
Reviews are relatively negative |
Approach to MBA studies is too narrow |
MBA placements aren’t as good due to lack of industry integration |
||
|
99 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
|
|
General perception in Kerala is positive. Unknown elsewhere |
Alumni reviews are relatively negative
|
Infrastructure isn’t up the mark for proper MBA studies |
Placements are below average |
||
|
100 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
|
Known only in Lucknow and adjoining areas
|
Alumni reviews highlight lack of strong placement programme |
Academics are considered reasonably good |
Placements are poor due to lack of a string alumni network |
||
|
101
|
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
|
College perception of any sort is present in the state only. Not known for MBA outside Kerala |
Alumni perception is relatively average |
Market dynamics are not ingratiated in curriculum |
Placements aren’t up the mark |
||
|
102
|
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
|
Known primarily for engineering across India |
Alumni criticize college for high intake |
High intake causes dip in academic standards |
Placements are average compared to other South Indian MBA colleges |
||
|
103
|
Mukesh Patel Institute of Technology, Management and Engineering, Mumbai |
6.7 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
College reputation banks on affiliation with NMIMS |
Alumni review are relatively positive |
Academics curriculum is derived from NMIMS, so quality of education is good |
Placements are average and not as good as NMIMS |
||
|
104
|
6.7 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
|
|
College isn’t known outside West Bengal |
Alumni perception is largely negative |
Not appropriate for management studies |
Placement cell not up to the mark |
||
|
105 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
|
|
Not the first choice amongst MBA aspirants |
Alumni reviews are relatively favorable due to presence of good faculties
|
Academics are good due to presence of some good faculties |
Placements aren’t up-to the mark even though B-school is present in Delhi |
||
|
106 |
Woxsen School of Business, Hyderbad |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
|
Known only in Hyderabad and adjoining areas
|
Alumni reviews are relatively negative |
Academic programme isn’t up to the mark |
Placements are low due to lack of alumni network |
||
|
107 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
|
|
Not the first choice amongst MBA aspirants |
Alumni review are relatively negative
|
Academics isn’t ideal for proper management studies |
Placements are lacking due to lack of industry exposure |
||
|
108
|
6.7 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.7 |
|
|
Well known in West Bengal. Not as famous elsewhere |
Alumni perception is mostly negative |
Quality of academics isn’t up to the scale of modern management requirements |
Placements are below average |
||
|
109 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.7 |
|
|
College isn’t known outside West Bengal |
Alumni perception is largely negative |
Not appropriate for management studies due to lack of focus on market dynamics |
Placement programme isn’t up to required level |
||
|
110 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|
|
Well known in West Bengal. Not acknowledged elsewhere |
Alumni perception is negative for most of the part |
Academic structure is shackled by affiliation to central university |
Placements are below average |
.png)
