India is a land of many trivial tendencies, none more so than the mad rush behind Top 100 Engineering Colleges in India. Every year during the peak summer season, the Indian education circus goes into top gear with the beckoning of engineering entrance exams.
From JEE Mains and Advanced to the other private entrance exams such as VITEEE and BITSAT, engineering admissions 2018 take precedence during these months over all other matters.
VIT Vellore was recently ranked the Best Private Engineering College in India in the list released by MHRD ministry of India
Due to the hoopla surrounding engineering as an education and a profession, many private engineering colleges have sprouted across the country. From a pure demand-and-supply point of view, such a trend is viable. However, the lack of quality at many such institutions raises a stern question mark over the validity of such a trend.
Thus, it is necessary for students to know the top B.Tech colleges in India. While most are very well aware about the prowess of the IITs and NITs, the situation changes when the question becomes about the top private engineering colleges in India.
The Factors
Contrary to popular belief, college rankings are not done on the basis of hunches. Any type of ranking system requisites the establishment of certain deciding factors which eventually play a key part in deciding the ranking of any given college.
The factors are:
1. College Perception
Almost all of our lives are shaped by perceptions. People shape their entire lives based on their perception of what a good life should be.
Moving away from the holistic aspects, the role of perception in branding the image of a college is irrevocably strong. Every action a college undertakes, from organizing a marketing campaign, or improving the academic structure of the college, every road leads to making or breaking college perception.
While top engineering colleges in India such as the IITs and NITs have a well-established perception amongst engineering aspirants, private engineering colleges have to work much harder to create a positive narrative around their institution.
Thus, while discerning the top private engineering colleges in India, analyzing the college perception is a crucial part of the process
Get Updated Review ( Voice Based Alumni Feeback)
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Lovely Professional University - [LPU] – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Amity University – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - DIT University Dehradoon – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Poornima University – Click Here
-
Check Review (Alumni Feedback) - Ansal University – Click Here
2. Alumni Reviews
Alumni reviews gather a lot of importance as they present a completely unfiltered opinion about a given institution.
Unlike marketing campaign professionals and admission counselors who are often biased towards the college they paid to promote, alumni of a particular college have no vested interest in creating a false narrative about their Alma matter. Thus, an aggregate score of the alumni reviews plays an important role in ranking the top private engineering colleges in the country.
3. Academics and Infrastructure
Academic structure and infrastructural capabilities go hand-in-hand in creating the optimal environment for engineering studies. Cohesion between these two aspects is of paramount importance as they together create a holistic atmosphere of learning at an institution.
BITS is India’s best private engineering college and one of the few institutions which gives the IITs a run for their money
Much of the success of the IITs and other top engineering colleges in India is down an air-tight academic plan and optimal infrastructural facilities. Thus, the importance of these two cannot be overstated in regards to an engineering college.
4. Placements
Placements at the end of the day are a net outcome of the overall performance of an engineering college across all necessary metrics. From academics, infrastructure, research facilities and libraries, each small details ends playing some part in helping or debilitating the placement scenario.
One of the key reasons most students clamor for the top private engineering colleges in the country is the promise of a hefty pay package at the end of four years.
Top private engineering colleges in India are discussed below.
|
Ranking |
College/University |
Perception (out of ten) |
Alumni reviews (out of ten) |
Academics and Infrastructure (out of ten) |
Placements (out of ten) |
|
1 |
9.3 |
9.4 |
9.6 |
9.3 |
|
|
Not solely dependent on IT sector with many students getting placed in core companies |
BITS has always been a trusted name in education since its inception |
BITS incorporates US university-style infrastructure with Indian customs and tendencies |
Nearly 75% of the faculty at BITS hold PhDs. This is a very high percentage, more than most top IITs as well |
||
|
2 |
9.1 |
8.9 |
9.5 |
9.4 |
|
|
Well received across India as a trusted institution for engineering
|
Alumni have generally been very positive |
Known for being very focused on academics and equally encouraging to pursue extra-curricular activities |
Almost all students get placed, which is incredible as its intake is very high |
||
|
3 |
Indian Institute of Information Technology, Design & Management (IITDM), Jabalpur |
9.1 |
9.0 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
|
Being an IT based college, most placements are in IT. Average package is very high |
IIIT brand name lends a generous perception to the institution |
Have an inherent focus on research-based learning and practical teaching |
Out of 57, 55 faculties have PhDs |
||
|
4 |
Dhirubhai Ambani Institute of Information and Communication Technology, Gandhinagar |
9.0 |
9.1 |
9.3 |
9.3 |
|
Respected and renowned for its undergraduate engineering programme
|
Very positive feedback from most alumni |
Due to low intake, teaching and faculty feedback is much easier |
Besides IT companies, many core companies also recruit gradates |
||
|
5 |
Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences (BITS) Goa |
9.0 |
9.1 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
|
Goa campus has built a strong name for itself aside from the initial boost it got from the ‘BITS’ name |
Alumni is generally very positive about their experience at BITS |
Similar to Pilani’s model which enables students to be self-motivated to learn and innovate |
Placements are high and balanced across all fields of engineering |
||
|
5 |
Birla Institute of Technology, Mesra |
9.0 |
9.0 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
|
Well known across India for being a top college for engineering
|
Feedback from ex-students is generally positive |
Academically sound. Decent number of PhD holding faculties and low intake help maintain academic quality |
Placements are reasonably even across different types of industries. |
||
|
6 |
Jaypee Institute of Information Technology (JIIT) Noida |
8.9 |
9.0 |
9.2 |
9.3 |
|
Nearly all students from the main branches get placed every year. However, dependency on IT sector is high |
The perception in and around the region is very good. |
Noida campus offers only CSE, IT, ECE and Biotech. Infrastructure for these branches is readily available |
54% faculties are PhD holders |
||
|
7 |
SRM University, Chennai |
8.9 |
8.9 |
9.2 |
9.1 |
|
Though its repute is flawless, SRM’s chancellor got caught in a scandal involving medical college admissions |
Favorable alumni feedback on a regular basis |
Are known for being extremely methodical and systematic in their academic approach |
Most students get placed every year |
||
|
8 |
Birla Institute of Technology and Sciences (BITS) Pilani – Hyderabad campus |
8.9 |
8.9 |
9.1 |
9.0 |
|
Carries the impeccable reputation of Pilani campus in its stride |
Alumni are always quick to shower praise |
Not as coherent as Pilani campus, but easily meets the requisite standards |
Quality of placements is excellent, but companies often choose to draw parallels with Pilani campus students |
||
|
9 |
Nirma University, Ahmedabad |
8.9 |
8.9 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
|
Is renowned in Gujarat for its engineering programmme
|
General feedback from alumni is positive |
Academic focus is easy to ingratiate due to low intake |
Placements are very good, but not on par with the like of IITs or NITs |
||
|
10 |
Thapar University, Patiala |
8.8 |
8.9 |
9.0 |
8.9 |
|
Placement record for undergraduate engineering is very good with a good mix of companies visiting the campus |
Well known and respected in Punjab. However, recent news of student accidents and drug abuse haven’t helped |
Ranks amongst India’s best infrastructure for engineering |
73% faculties have PhDs at Thapar University |
||
|
11 |
Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Technology (MAIT) Delhi |
8.8 |
8.8 |
9.0 |
8.0 |
|
Placement numbers are very good, but dependence in IT sector is high |
Regarded as the best engineering college under IPU |
Lacks the financial muscle to match other universities |
Known for top draw faculties |
||
|
12 |
PSG College of Engineering, Coimbatore |
8.9 |
9.2 |
8.9 |
9.0 |
|
Not as known as the likes of VIT and SRM, but well respected in the industry |
Alumni reviews generally portray PSG as a well-run college |
Affiliated to Anna University. Maintains a threshold of expected academic performances from students |
Well respected in industrial circles for training top quality engineers |
||
|
13 |
Jamia Millia Islamia (JMI), Delhi |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
8.9 |
|
Placements are generally decent with a good mix of industries visiting |
Very famous in Delhi |
Lack the financial clout of some other private university |
Almost all faculties are PhDs, but number of faculties is less compared to other colleges |
||
|
14 |
Sastra University, Thanjavur |
8.5 |
8.8 |
9.2 |
9.0 |
|
Like RV, known well in Tamil Nadu but not as much further North |
Positive feedback from most alumni |
Known for being extremely strict on matter of academic importance |
Stellar placement record with most core branch students getting placed |
||
|
15 |
Ajay Kumar Garg Engineering College (AKGEC), Ghaziabad |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.9 |
8.8 |
|
Placements at AKGEC have a reasonable mix of core companies and IT sector visiting for campus hiring |
While it isn’t as widely known as other colleges, AKGEC has a niche reputation amongst UP engineering aspirants |
Overall focus skewed towards placements rather than research and subject focus |
38% faculties have PhDs at AKGEC |
||
|
16 |
8.5 |
8.9 |
9.1 |
9.0 |
|
|
Well respected in Bangalore, but not as famous amongst other parts of India |
Alumni reviews draw positive feedback |
Very strict and vigilant in terms of maintaining academic decorum |
Placements are great due to close proximity to India’s biggest IT hub |
||
|
17 |
Amity University, Noida |
8.5 |
8.8 |
8.9 |
8.7 |
|
Amity Placements are heavily reliant on IT companies |
Due to immensely high intake, perception isn’t as positive as other top colleges |
Amity lays down the marker for world class infrastructure with state-of-the-art labs and e-learning resources |
With almost 850 faculties, nearly half have PhDs in their respective dissertations |
||
|
18 |
ITM University, Gwalior |
8.4 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
8.7 |
|
Reliance on IT sector is very high |
Since it is still relatively new, perception is less favorable compared to other engineering colleges |
Due to low intake, general facilities are more easily accessible and environment is favorable for learning |
Only 38 faculties have PhDs amongst 87 |
||
|
19 |
8.4 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
|
|
Known primarily in Tamil Nadu |
Most alumni feedback is favorable |
Affiliated to Anna University and known for being highly diligent in academic matters |
Placements are decent but too skewed towards the IT sector |
||
|
20 |
Bharati Vidyapeeth’s College of Engineering, Pune |
8.7 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
|
Not in the category of BITS or IIT, but well known in many parts of India |
The feedback gained from ex-students is positive in summation with a few exceptions |
Academics is the same as any standard engineering college, but labs aren’t as well equipped as they should be. |
Placements are decent with most students picking up jobs during campus placements |
||
|
21 |
8.5 |
8.7 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
|
|
Well known in local area, but not as much in other parts of India |
Alumni consider the college adept and well maintained for conducive engineering education |
Academic and extra-curricular activities are given equal credence |
Has maintained a sustainable track record of placements over the years |
||
|
22 |
Manipal Institute of Technology (MIT) , Manipal |
8.8 |
8.5 |
9.0 |
8.9 |
|
Well known across India. More popular for the medical programme provided by its sister institution |
Alumni feedback is usually favorable |
Follows syllabus and curriculum of foreign universities |
Placements are good, but reliant on the IT sector |
||
|
23 |
Veermata Jijabai Technological Institute, Mumbai |
8.4 |
8.7 |
8.9 |
9.1 |
|
Not well known in other parts of India besides Maharashtra
|
General feedback is favorable |
Proactive in matters relating to academics. |
Placements are one of the strongest points of the college |
||
|
24 |
BMS College of Engineering, Bangalore |
8.4 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
8.8 |
|
College perception is great amongst those who know about the institution. Relatively unknown in North India |
Alumni feedback is very positive due to great impression of college in |
Low intake and good quality faculty help in forming a good core in a strong academic programme |
Strong alumni network aids immensely during placements |
||
|
25 |
8.4 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
8.7 |
|
|
Is counted amongst the top private colleges for engineering
|
Feedback from alumni is positive |
Academic focus isn’t as easy to ingratiate due to high intake |
Placements are contingent on the mood and cycle of the IT sector |
||
|
26 |
Jaypee University of Information Technology (JUIT), Solan |
8.4 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
|
As the name suggests, JUIT is focused primarily on the IT sector |
General reputation is good, but isn’t as famous as its Noida counterpart |
Reasonably well-maintained infrastructure with key focus on IT |
67% faculties have Ph.Ds
|
||
|
27 |
Maharashtra Institute of Technology, Pune |
8.4 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.7 |
|
Known and respected in Maharashtra, but relatively unknown elsewhere |
Alumni are very open about their admiration for the college |
Academic quality is easily maintained due to low intake and selective criteria for admissions |
Placement record has consistently been good with most students getting placed |
||
|
28 |
CEPT University, Ahmedabad |
8.4 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.6 |
|
Considered a great college dedicated for civil engineering concepts. Highly popular amongst civil aspirants |
Feedback is generally positive about the institution |
Highly methodical and focused in their approach to civil engineering disciplines |
Placements are only done in the core sector with a sizable number of students bagging campus placements |
||
|
29 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
|
Known mostly in the state itself, where it is renowned for technical education |
Feedback is very positive highlighting the college’s unique approach to engineering education |
A more practical approach is adopted which focuses on skill-based learning rather than theoretical learning |
Placements leave room for improvement. Since college was established recently, alumni-network isn’t as strong |
||
|
30 |
CV Raman College of Engineering, Bhubaneswar |
8.3 |
8.5 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
Known in Orissa and other parts of India for a strong B.Tech programme |
Favorable feedback highlighting the focus on creative thinking |
Ingratiates theoretical knowledge with practical applications |
Recruitment has remained consistently good over the years |
||
|
31 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
|
Though the college is well known and respected in Maharashtra, it is otherwise unknown in other parts |
Alumni feedback supports the notion of the college being adept for engineering |
Low intake ensures quality of teaching is maintained |
Strength of alumni network ensures sound placement record |
||
|
32 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
|
Not known very well outside Karnataka |
Alumni perception is mixed |
Very strict and inhibitive with regards to academics |
Placements rely on IT companies
|
||
|
33 |
Pandit Deendayal Petroleum University, Gandhinagar |
8.3 |
8.2 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
Perception of college is decent as a primarily for petroleum engineering |
Alumni feedback is positive. But critical of college’s placement programme and high fees |
Very sound academic structure built around creating a holistic environment for engineering education |
Lack of placements are a major concern as college does not have outreach programme with industry partners |
||
|
34 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.6 |
8.5 |
|
|
Is well known in South India, but not as much up North
|
Alumni perception is very good owing to the college’s supportive approach to academics |
Encourages innovative thinking and research initiatives. Outcome based teaching and training incorporated |
Placements are generally very good across all branches |
||
|
35 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.5 |
8.5 |
|
|
Not known as well outside Maharashtra |
Alumni perception is normally favorable, with some reviews suggesting the college should focus more on extra-curricular |
Irrevocable in matters of academics. Quality of teaching is sustainable due to low intake |
Due to presence in India’s financial hub, placements are generally very good
|
||
|
36 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.4 |
8.5 |
|
|
Well known in Chhattisgarh, but not as much in other parts of India |
Alumni consider the college capable of creating a conducive environment for education. Fees is also less compared to other private colleges |
Known for mechanical and civil branches, while lesser renowned for CS and IT |
Depends on the IT sector for placements |
||
|
37 |
KJ Somaiya College of Engineering, Mumbai |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.4 |
8.4 |
|
Perceived well in Maharashtra but unknown in North and South India |
Alumni reviews suggest the college’s strong affinity to holistic education |
Is well known for its emphasis to fields of research and innovation
|
Strong alumni network is a string factor for consistent placement record |
||
|
38 |
Vellore Institute of Technology (VIT), Chennai |
8.0 |
8.3 |
8.5 |
8.4 |
|
Was caught in a controversy when rumors emerged over its UGC approval status, which was granted in 2013 while it incongruously started taking admissions in 2011 |
Isn’t ardently positive due to the controversy mentioned before |
Academically sound as it follows the same template as VIT Vellore |
Largely dependent on VIT Vellore for placements |
||
|
39 |
SRM University, Sonepat |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.4 |
|
Since it was only established recently, placements cannot be judged
|
Banks on the SRM name for perception of its NCR campus |
Infrastructure is a template from its South Indian counterparts |
Healthy mix of PhDs and M.Tech faculties |
||
|
40 |
Manipal University, Jaipur |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.3 |
|
Most students get placed, but majority hiring industry is again IT |
Overshadowed by its sister institution in the South |
Like all Manipal institutions, infrastructure is world-class |
Faculty-to-student ratio is skewed |
||
|
41 |
JSS Academy of Technical Education (JSSATE), Noida |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.3 |
8.2 |
|
IT industry are the major hirers at JSS |
Famous primarily in Delhi-NCR region
|
Infrastructure is lacking for all branches of engineering such as civil, ECE and mechanical |
Faculty-to-student ratio is optimal, but PhD faculties are less in proportion |
||
|
42 |
Academy of Technology, Hooghly |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
Known and respected in West Bengal and neighboring states |
Alumni perception is very positive |
A bit tied down in terms of curriculum die to affiliation with university |
Placements are generally excellent |
||
|
43 |
Galgotia College of Engineering and Technology (GCET), Greater Noida |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
IT giants such as HCL, TCS and Infosys amongst primary hirers |
A relatively decent reputation compares to most UPTU colleges |
With increase in intake every year, infrastructure is slowly becoming inadequate for students |
Rising intake is causing faculty-student ratio to decline. |
||
|
44 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.2 |
|
|
Has a reasonably sound reputation in the state |
Is respected and appreciated by alumni |
Quality of teaching isn’t compromised by maintaining a low intake |
Placement record is excellent owing to wide industry outreach |
||
|
45 |
Krishna Institute of Technology (KIET) Ghaziabad |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
|
Major recruiter are IT companies such as HCL and other local IT-based companies |
Relatively unknown outside NCR region |
College environment healthy due to low intake |
Lack of PhD qualified students |
||
|
46 |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.2 |
8.1 |
|
|
Amongst the best engineering colleges in Orissa
|
Feedback is favorable and largely positive |
Balanced in its approach to academics and extra-curriculars |
Placement record at GITA is consistently good |
||
|
47 |
ABES Engineering College (ABESEC) Ghaziabad |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
|
IT sector counts amongst major campus placement recruiter |
Renowned amongst UPTU-affiliated institutions |
Infrastructure is found lacking relative to Amity and Manipal |
Lack of PhD qualified faculties at the helm |
||
|
48 |
YMCA University of Science and Technology (YMCA-UST), Faridabad |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
|
Most recruiters are from IT sector, but presence of manufacturing hub nearby bolsters core company hiring |
Relatively respected amongst students and industry hirers |
Infrastructure is wide off the mark considering the level of other private institutions |
Lack of PhD qualified faculties |
||
|
49 |
8.0 |
8.1 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
|
College is well received and known in Karnataka |
Alumni perception is generally positive
|
Due to high intake, student to faculty ratio is very high |
Due to vicinity to Bangalore’s IT hub, lion share of placement is held by IT sector |
||
|
50 |
Lovely Professional University (LPU), Jalandhar |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
|
Only a handful get placed in core companies |
Extremely high intake acts as bane for reputation |
Resembles the ‘Cosmopolitan college’ model. Adequate facilities and strict environment |
Ratio of PhD qualified faculties is less |
||
|
51 |
Chitkara University, Chandigarh |
8.0 |
8.0 |
7.9 |
8.0 |
|
Core company placement ratio is almost negligible |
Chitkara is well known in Punjab |
Like Amity and LPU, adopts a cosmopolitan campus-like approach |
Skewed faculty-student ratio and lack of PhD holding faculties |
||
|
52 |
Chandigarh University, Chandigarh |
8.0 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
8.0 |
|
Dependent on mass recruitment from IT companies |
Recently established. Has garnered positive feedback from alumni |
Infrastructural capabilities are suitable for some branches and inadequate for others |
High intake and low number of PhD holders |
||
|
53 |
Shiv Nadar University (SNU), Dadri |
8.0 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
Like most private universities in UP, SNU is heavily conditional on IT sector for placements |
Recently established. Perception is positive as the founder, Shiv Nadar, is a well known industry big-wig |
Adequate infrastructure for technical education |
Low intake insures faculty-to-student ratio is optimal, but PhD faculties are low in number |
||
|
54 |
Dr CV Raman University, Bilaspur |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
Known and respected in local areas. Most students are from Chhattisgarh and Bihar
|
Alumni perception is largely positive. Some reviews advise college to develop its placement cell |
Academics is kept as the foremost priority |
Placement cell isn’t as adept as other top engineering college in India |
||
|
55 |
G.L Bajaj Institute of Technology and Management, Greater Noida |
7.9 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
7.9 |
|
IT sector mass recruitment a key source of placement |
Largely unknown outside NCR region |
Very strict in terms of academics with relatively low focus on research |
Faculty-student ratio is workable but number of PhD faculties is very low |
||
|
56 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
|
|
College is well received and known in Gujarat |
Alumni perception is generally favorable |
Fixed intake which maintains a certain level of teaching |
Strong alumni network works is favor of consistent placements |
||
|
57 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.9 |
|
|
Perception is good but known amongst Telangana students only |
Alumni review generally laud the college for its effort and attitude towards education |
Well rounded academic structure, but more equipped for CS and IT than core branches like mechanical and civil |
Strong alumni network contributes to consistent track record placements |
||
|
58 |
OP Jindal University, Raigarh |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
|
Student population is formed by students from Chhattisgarh and neighboring states, highlighting its lack of popularity elsewhere |
Since the first batch of engineering hasn’t graduated yet, alumni reviews are non-existent |
Known for its strong curriculum for engineering education |
First batch yet to graduate |
||
|
59
|
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
|
|
Core company recruiters only take a handful of students |
Usually placed amongst mid range UPTU colleges |
College environment isn’t ideal relative to other colleges on the list |
Intake is high in mainstream branches which have a lack of PhD qualified faculties |
||
|
60 |
7.7 |
7.8 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
|
|
Perception is excellent but known solely amongst Maharashtra students |
Alumni reviews are highly praising of the college |
Low intake in each branch allows for better structuring of a sound academic plan |
Placement record is very consistent due to strong industry outreach |
||
|
61 |
Raj Kumar Goel Institute of Technology (RKGIT), Ghaziabad |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.8 |
7.7 |
|
Placement in IT is also average. Core company hiring almost negligible
|
Perception is relatively good compared to other colleges in UP |
Isn’t well equipped to successfully produce high-grade engineers |
Lack of PhD faculties is a major concern |
||
|
62 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
|
|
Placements are heavily distorted towards the IT sector |
Perception is favorable in Delhi-NCR region |
Infrastructure is adequate for some courses, but inadequate for others |
Intake is too high for the level of infrastructure and the relative faculty strength |
||
|
63 |
National Institute of Science and Technology, Berhampur |
7.7 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
|
Well respected in state and neighboring regions but not known otherwise in North and South India |
Alumni reviews are a mixed bag/ Some give into the notion of the college being capable of providing sound engineering education while some disagree completely |
A major proportion of faculties are known to be below par for teaching core engineering subjects |
Lack of industry integration is a major cause for sub-par placements |
||
|
64 |
Shri Ramdeobaba College of Engineering and Management, Nagpur |
7.7 |
7.5 |
7.7 |
7.7 |
|
Perception in Vidarbha region is very good along with the rest of Maharastra |
Alumni reviews paint the college in an even brighter college for being a well-run institution for engineering |
Experienced faculties with a normal intake ensure academic quality remains uncompromised |
Placement record is very consistent due to a number of administrative and holistic factors |
||
|
65 |
Adhiyamaan College of Engineering, Hosur |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.7 |
7.6 |
|
Perception is marred by mixed placement track record |
Mixed reviews from alumni |
Reasonably decent academic programme with focus on skill-based learning |
Weak alumni network contributes to inconsistency in placements |
||
|
66 |
Shri Shankaracharya Group of Institutions, Bhilai |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
|
Overall consensus amongst aspirants and general public is average |
Alumni feedback hinges on the college being just average |
Academic standard a constant with affiliation to another university in Bhilai |
Placements poor due to absence of industry integration |
||
|
67 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.6 |
7.5 |
|
|
Placement programme isn’t up to speed due to lack of alumni network |
Since it is relatively new, college perception is still on a slippery slope |
Very stable in terms of infrastructure |
Lack of PhD scholars and high intake work against MMU |
||
|
68 |
Birla Institute of Technology, Patna |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.6 |
7.5 |
|
Known because of the ‘BIT’ tag. Essentially an extension centre of BIT Mesra |
Alumni perception is positive, but tends to be more praising of BIT Mesra |
Academic standards are maintained due to its affliation with BIT Mesra |
Placements are good, but not as good as the main campus in Mesra
|
||
|
69 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.5 |
|
|
Relatively unknown outside Andhra Pradesh |
Alumni perception isn’t vociferously positive due to high intake relative to the available facilities |
Due to high intake, student focus can sometimes go awry |
Major recruiters are IT giants such as Infosys, TCS ,Cognizant and other local IT-based companies |
||
|
70 |
GLA University, Mathura |
7.5 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
|
Lack of proper recruitment drive to absence of strong alumni network and industry integration |
Lack of placements drive perception down |
Infrastructure for core branch labs and research facilities is minimal |
Faulty strength is low compared to the intake of the university |
||
|
71 |
7.5 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.5 |
|
|
Perceived well in West Bengal but unknown in other states |
Alumni reviews regard college as one of the best private institutions in East India |
Tied down due to affiliation with external university
|
Placements aren’t as good as otherwise expected |
||
|
72 |
Institute of Engineering and Rural Technology (IERT), Allahabad |
7.5 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
|
Poor placements due to lack of industry integration |
Perception is relatively sound due to better academic qualities than most UPTU colleges |
Infrastructure isn’t adequate for a rounded engineering education |
Faculty strength is optimal due to low intake |
||
|
73 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
|
|
Most of the students taking admission are from the eastern part of India, suggesting college isn’t relatively known in other parts of India |
Generates a positive response amongst alumni |
Like the previous cases, affiliation to university restricts college from expanding the curriculum |
Lack of industry exposure inhibits placements |
||
|
74 |
Institute of Engineering and Management, Kolkata |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.3 |
7.4 |
|
Majority of the students come from West Bengal, suggesting its lack of popularity elsewhere |
Alumni perception is mixed |
Academically constrained by affiliation with external university |
Placements are reasonably decent |
||
|
75 |
7.4 |
7.4 |
7.2 |
7.4 |
|
|
Good perception is restricted within state lines |
Alumni perception is mixed with both positive and negative reviews |
Academically capable with affiliation to Anna University |
IT sector counts amongst major campus placement recruiter |
||
|
76 |
IEC College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida |
7.3 |
7.4 |
7.2 |
7.4 |
|
Placements in IT have also been hit due to jobs slowdown
|
Isn’t widely known outside NCR region |
Infrastructure is an issue as many labs are not equipped enough |
Faculty strength is optimal, but quality of teaching isn’t up to scale |
||
|
77 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
|
|
Not well known in the region
|
Alumni perception is generally decent |
Academically very strict. Unyielding stance on issue like attendance |
IT companies are the major recruiters during placement season |
||
|
78 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
|
|
Placements are found lacking in IT and core sector |
Perception isn’t great based on various alumni feedback |
Infrastructure based on requirements for technical education is inadequate |
Faculty strength is low compared to intake |
||
|
79 |
Mukesh Patel School of Technology Management and Engineering, Mumbai |
7.3 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
|
Considered a decent college for engineering |
Alumni reviews suggest a mixed bag of positives and negatives to take away from |
Academic core is weak as students often complain about lack of quality teachers |
Placements are rudderless with mass recruitment the major and sometimes only hope |
||
|
80 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.3 |
7.2 |
|
|
Perception as a decent engineering college is restricted to South India only |
Relatively respected amongst students and industry hirers |
Reasonable standard of education with affiliation to Visvesvaraya Technological University |
Most recruiters are from IT sector |
||
|
81 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
|
|
Perception in the state is mixed while it unknown elsewhere |
Reviews are a mixed bag for this particular college |
Relatively good for academics, but affiliation with external university hampers curriculum flexibility |
Lack of industrial exposure is a hindrance to college |
||
|
82 |
7.2 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
|
|
High intake acts as bane for reputation |
Alumni perception is positive with one common hindrance that the fees is considered high |
Academic focus is systemically strong, but high intake causes loss in student focus |
Only a handful get placed in core companies |
||
|
83 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.2 |
|
|
Perception as a good engineering college is restricted to Maharashtra |
Alumni reviews give a favorable image of the college |
Intake is limited to ensure sound academic decorum |
Recruitment during campus placements is usually done by IT recruiters |
||
|
84 |
7.2 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
|
|
Unknown in most parts of North India and some parts of South India |
Alumni perception is positive |
Academic capabilities are suitable for some branches and inadequate for others |
Heavily reliant on mass recruitment from IT companies |
||
|
85 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.1 |
|
|
Recently established, so reputation is dicey in local areas |
Reviews suggest the need for certain infrastructural capabilities to be upgraded |
Due to the college being autonomous, curriculum is very flexible |
Placements are average due to lack of alumni network |
||
|
86 |
AD Patel Institute of Technology, Anand |
7.1 |
7.1 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
|
Very well known in western India. One of Gujrat’s biggest educational institutions |
Feedback from ex-students is usually positive |
Academic focus is desgined around the imparting of practical-concept-based learning |
Placements are very good across the core branches such as CS, IT, ECE and Mechanical |
||
|
87 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
|
|
Unknown in most parts of North India, but considered one of Goa’s best engineering colleges |
Alumni perception is positive except for the fees which is considered too steep |
Only four branches with 60 students in each branch ensure college is overrun with large intake, thus maintaining quality of teaching |
Placements are a problem at the college due to lack of strong alumni network |
||
|
88 |
7.0 |
7.1 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
|
|
Well known in Tamil Nadu, but that is not the case in North India |
Mixed opinion about various academic and qualitative factors |
Affiliated to Anna University |
Core company placement ratio is very low |
||
|
89 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
|
|
Not as well known as other private colleges in Orissa
|
Alumni perception is torn between the good and the poor aspects of the college |
Academically sound as they retain the right to dictate their own curriculum |
Placements are decent compared to other colleges |
||
|
90 |
6.9 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
|
|
Considered a decent enough college for engineering in Chhattisgarh |
General consensus surrounding the college is mixed between good and bad reviews |
Academically strained by the affiliation with external university |
Placements are good compared to other colleges in the state |
||
|
91 |
Karunya University, Coimbatore |
6.9 |
7.0 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
|
Perception is average compared to other top colleges on the list |
Alumni reviews are mixed with most pointing out the rules framed to restrict students |
Industry oriented teaching isn’t up to the scale |
Placements aren’t a cent percent surety. IT companies are the major recruiters |
||
|
92 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
7.0 |
6.9 |
|
|
Well known in Pune, but that is not the case for other parts of India |
Opinion seems to be divided according to college reviews |
Lack of industry exposure and over-emphasis on theoretical concepts act as bane for |
IT remains the only recruiter |
||
|
93 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
College perception isn’t top draw due to poor response of industry and alumni |
Alumni reception is comparatively negative |
Strict in terms of academics with low focus on skill based learning |
IT sector are the major recruiters, though there is no guarantee of placements unlike other top colleges |
||
|
94 |
Bengal Institute of Technology, Kolkata |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
|
Perception is restricted in West Bengal and nearby states |
Alumni reviews imply that the college is relatively average in most areas |
Like many colleges in West Bengal, constrained due to affiliation with university |
Placements are above average due to consistent industry exposure |
||
|
95
|
Datta Meghe Institute of Engineering Technology and Research, Wardha |
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
|
College perception isn’t ideal |
Alumni reviews are mostly critical of the college |
Lack of focus on new subjects such as robotics and automation |
Placements aren’t the best they could be either |
||
|
96
|
Acharya Institute of Technology, Bangalore |
6.9 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
More famous for its management courses |
Considered too expensive for the return on investment |
Reasonable standard of education with affiliation to Visvesvaraya Technological University |
Core company recruiters only take a handful of students with most going to IT companies |
||
|
97 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
|
College perception isn’t unimpeachable as it still is relatively new |
Alumni reception is appreciative of the university infrastructure and faculties |
Still relatively new to fully analyze, but the college has adept infrastructural facilities and quality faculties |
Placements analysis isn’t ideal to conduct as off now as college is still relatively new |
||
|
98 |
Christ University, Bangalore |
6.8 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
6.8 |
|
More popular for MBA, BBA and other humanities programmes |
Alumni consider college ill-equipped for proper engineering Education |
Isn’t well equipped to successfully produce high-grade engineers |
Placement in IT is average. Core company hiring almost negligible
|
||
|
99 |
Christian College of Engineering and Technology, Bhilai
|
6.8 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.8 |
|
Known amongst localities in Bhilai |
Feedback from ex-students is relatively negative |
Follows curriculum and teaching methodology set by external university |
Placements are very poor |
||
|
100 |
6.8 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
|
|
More famous for its management courses |
Considered to be decent enough for an engineering degree |
Reasonable mix of academics and extra-curricular activities |
Placements are reasonably good considering the downturn in the jobs market |
||
|
101 |
TKM College of Engineering, Kollam |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
|
Perception is favorable in Kerala, but non-existent outside |
Alumni consider the college well-run and suitable for engineering |
Too focused on theoretical aspects rather than practical learning |
Placements are heavily distorted towards the IT sector |
||
|
102 |
Amity University, Kolkata |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
|
Famous purely due to its marketing campaign |
Alumni perception is negative for most of the part |
Academics are relatively good owing to its autonomy over its curriculum |
Placements aren’t up-to the mark due to lack of integration with industries |
||
|
103 |
Rajarambapu Institute of Technology, Sangli |
6.7 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|
Not perceived as a top engineering college |
Alumni reviews suggest college is a good option for students who fail to make it to other top colleges |
Isn’t well endowed to properly provide engineering education |
Placement is no guarantee as students have to work very hard to get placed
|
||
|
104 |
6.7 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|
|
Relatively unknown outside the state |
Reviews are disparaging about the college’s merit |
Academics aren’t up to the mark due to lack of proper faculties |
Placements are generally poor |
||
|
105 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|
|
Lack of placements have caused college perception to dip |
Alumni perception is mixed with anequal mix of positive and negative points |
Academically stable with affiliation to University of Calicut |
Placement record isn’t ideal which is down to lack of alumni network |
||
|
106 |
Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering and Research, Nagpur |
6.5 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
6.6 |
|
Perception is favorable in Nagpur, but non-existent outside |
Feedback from alumni highlight some good and bad points of the college |
Too focused on theoretical curriculum rather than practical knowledge |
Placements are from the IT sector. |
||
|
107 |
6.5 |
6.6 |
6.5 |
6.6 |
|
|
College perception isn’t ideal |
Alumni reviews are mostly negative |
Focus primarily on theoretical concepts of engineering |
Placements are below par |
||
|
108 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.6 |
6.5 |
|
|
Placement and academic inconsistency causes perception to fluctuate |
Alumni perception is mixed with the most common complaint being the superfluous number of trivial rules |
Focus on industry-oriented learning is low |
Lack of alumni network and industry outreach drives perception down |
||
|
109 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
|
|
College perception is good amongst students |
Alumni reviews paint a good picture of the college |
Academically adept in terms of infrastructure and facilities |
Placement record has shown signs of consistency |
||
|
110 |
Sri Venkateshwara College of Engineering, Bangalore |
6.5 |
6.4 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
|
Perception isn’t ideal due to lackluster placement record |
Alumni reviews signal lack of effort made to reach out to companies for placements |
Able to maintain a certain standard due to affiliation with Visvesvaraya Technological University |
Lack of drive to bring companies to the campus |
||
|
111 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.5 |
6.5 |
|
|
Perception is solely built upon its much more illustrious management programme |
Alumni perception is very positive regarding the college’s infrastructure |
Focus on skill-based learning and industry oriented teaching |
Placements haven’t taken off as college is still identified to be better for management students |
||
|
112 |
Dhaneswar Rath Institute of Engineering and Management Studies, Khordh |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.5 |
|
College perception isn’t up to the mark |
Alumni perception is largely negative |
Industry oriented teaching is found lacking |
Placements are poor due to lack of alumni network |
||
|
113
|
Sarvajanik College of Engineering and Technology, Surat |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
|
Unknown outside Gujarat for engineering |
College reviews give a positive spin on the college’s capability to provide engineering education |
More focused on theoretical learning rather than skill-based training |
Mostly from the IT sector |
||
|
114 |
Gandhi Engineering College, Bhubaneswar |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.3 |
|
Barely considered for engineering in state itself |
Alumni deem the college misguided for offering engineerg |
Academically poor due to lack of proper faculties |
Placements are poor as well |
||
|
115 |
Rajeev Gandhi Memorial College of Engineering and Technology, Kurnool |
6.4 |
6.4 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
|
Isn’t known outside South India |
Alumni reviews pint out lack of facilities which are otherwise quotidian at engineering colleges |
Very low focus on innovative learning and skill-based teaching |
Placements in IT have also been hit due to jobs slowdown
|
||
|
116 |
Ravi Shankar Institute of Technology and Management, Raipur
|
6.4 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
|
Not perceived as a top engineering college in Chhattisgarh |
Alumni reviews are very disparaging about the college’s infrastructure |
Isn’t good enough to provide engineering education |
Placements are poor due to all-round disparity of the college
|
||
|
117 |
Pragati College of Engineering and Management, Raipur |
6.3 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
|
Perception is unfavorable in home state itself |
Feedback from ex-students is usually poor |
Focused primarily on old and redundant engineering concepts |
Recruitment is also very poor |
||
|
118 |
ITM University, Raipur |
6.3 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
6.3 |
|
College perception banks upon reputation of sister institution in Gwalior |
General feedback suggests a lack of coherence for technical studies |
Curriculum too theoretical for proper engineering studies |
Placement isn’t up to the expectations of students |
||
|
119 |
Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur |
6.3 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
|
Isn’t known outside Maharashtra |
Alumni reviews paint a favorable image of the college |
Focus on industry oriented learning and skill-training is low |
Campus placements are solely premised on IT sector
|
||
|
120 |
Institute of Engineering and Industrial Technology, Durgapur |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.2 |
6.3 |
|
Considered inadequate for a proper engineering course |
Alumni perception largely highlighting lack of synchronism required for engineering education |
Focus primarily on old and redundant engineering studies rather than industry-oriented teaching resources |
Placements are found lacking due to lack of industrial integration |
Note: The colleges mentioned in the list above are private colleges and universities or public universities with private roots of establishment. Government colleges have been omitted as most students are already well aware of the qualities of top government engineering colleges. Discussing them again would have been redundant and futile. Thus, government colleges have not been discussed.
